Legislature(1999 - 2000)

1999-05-13 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

1999-05-13                     House Journal                      Page 1382
HB 85                                                                        
The following, which had been moved to the bottom of the calendar              
(page 1373), was read the second time:                                         
                                                                               
HOUSE BILL NO. 85                                                             
"An Act relating to licensure and professional discipline of                  
members of the teaching profession and providing for related                   
penalties; relating to grounds for dismissal of a teacher; relating to         
the Professional Teaching Practices Commission; relating to                    
limited immunity for procedures under the Educator Ethics Act;                 
making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective                   
date."                                                                         
                                                                               
                                                                               
with the:                                                 Journal Page         
                                                                               
	HES RPT  2DP 3NR                                                  598         
	ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DOE) 2/10/99                                    599         
	JUD RPT  CS(JUD) 4DP                                              941         
	ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DOE) 2/10/99                                    941         
	FIN RPT  CS(FIN) 1DP 9NR                                         1194         
	ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DOE) 2/10/99                                   1195         
                                                                               

1999-05-13                     House Journal                      Page 1383
HB 85                                                                        
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the                
following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill:        
                                                                               
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 85(FIN)                                                 
	(same title)                                                                  
                                                                               
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                   
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Ogan:                            
                                                                               
Page 5, line 25, following "state":                                            
	Insert ", local municipality,"                                                
                                                                               
Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that                     
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Objection was heard.                                                           
                                                                               
Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw              
Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 2 was offered  by Representative Ogan:                            
                                                                               
Page 5, line 25, following "substantial":                                      
	Insert ", or continued"                                                       
                                                                               
Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that                     
Amendment No. 2 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Croft objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 85(FIN)                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 2                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  7   NAYS:  27   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  4                              

1999-05-13                     House Journal                      Page 1384
HB 85                                                                        
                                                                               
Yeas:  Coghill, Cowdery, Dyson, Kohring, Mulder, Ogan, Rokeberg                
                                                                               
Nays:  Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Davis, Green,           
Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula,              
Kott, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Smalley,            
Therriault, Whitaker, Williams                                                 
                                                                               
Excused:  Kookesh, Masek                                                       
                                                                               
Absent:  Austerman, Barnes, Foster, Grussendorf                                
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 3 was offered  by Representative Ogan:                            
                                                                               
Page 5, line 22, following "manner":                                           
	Insert "or impede a student's ability to receive the level of                 
education prescribed under state law"                                          
                                                                               
Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that                     
Amendment No. 3 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Brice objected.                                                 
                                                                               
Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw              
Amendment No. 3.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 4 was offered  by Representative Ogan:                            
                                                                               
Page 5, line 18, following "Commission":                                       
	Delete "may"                                                                  
	Insert "shall"                                                                
                                                                               
Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that                     
Amendment No. 4 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Dyson objected.                                                 
                                                                               
                                                                               

1999-05-13                     House Journal                      Page 1385
HB 85                                                                        
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 85(FIN)                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 4                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  2   NAYS:  32   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  4                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Kohring, Ogan                                                           
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill,            
Cowdery, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Halcro,             
Harris, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kott, Morgan,               
Moses, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Smalley, Therriault,              
Whitaker, Williams                                                             
                                                                               
Excused:  Kookesh, Masek                                                       
                                                                               
Absent:  Croft, James, Mulder, Rokeberg                                        
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
Amendment No. 5 was offered  by Representative Dyson:                           
                                                                               
Page 12, line 6:                                                               
	Delete "and"                                                              
                                                                               
Page 12, line 8, following "AS 14.20.029(f)"                               
	Insert "; and"                                                            
                                                                               
Page 12, following line 8:                                                     
	Insert a new paragraph to read:                                               
		"(5) review the staff's decision to dismiss a complaint,                  
upon filing by the complainant of a written request for review                 
by the commission within 15 days after receipt of notice of the                
dismissal; the request for review must contain a statement of                  
reasons for the relief requested."                                           
                                                                               
Representative Dyson moved and asked unanimous consent that                    
Amendment No. 5 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               

1999-05-13                     House Journal                      Page 1386
HB 85                                                                        
Objection was heard.                                                           
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 85(FIN)                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 5                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  34   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  4                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill,            
Cowdery, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Halcro,             
Harris, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott,              
Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Smalley,            
Therriault, Whitaker, Williams                                                 
                                                                               
Excused:  Kookesh, Masek                                                       
                                                                               
Absent:  Croft, James, Mulder, Rokeberg                                        
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 5 was adopted.                                           
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB
85(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and              
placed on final passage.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.         
                                                                               
CSHB 85(FIN) am was read the third time.                                       
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 85(FIN) am pass the House?"  The              
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
CSHB 85(FIN) am                                                                
Third Reading                                                                  
Final Passage                                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  34   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  4                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill,            
Cowdery, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Halcro,             
Harris, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott,              
Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Smalley,            
Therriault, Whitaker, Williams                                                 

1999-05-13                     House Journal                      Page 1387
HB 85                                                                        
Excused:  Kookesh, Masek                                                       
                                                                               
Absent:  Croft, James, Mulder, Rokeberg                                        
                                                                               
And so, CSHB 85(FIN) am passed the House.                                      
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll           
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.           
                                                                               
CSHB 85(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.